This content associated with student’s work that is scientific review and writeup on the manager
Review by FQW manager
Within the review, the manager characterizes the standard of work, notes the strengths, will pay attention that is special shortcomings, determines the level of independency and approach that is creative because of the pupil during the time scale of composing the qualifying that is final, the amount of conformity because of the needs for final qualifying works regarding the appropriate degree, suggests the ultimate qualifying benefit security with a specific score.
The review should evaluate this content and main conditions regarding the evaluated work, measure the relevance for the selected theme, the independency of this way of its disclosure (existence of this author’s own point of view), the capability to make use of contemporary types of collecting and processing information, the amount of credibility of this conclusions and recommendations, the dependability associated with the outcomes, their novelty and practical importance. Along With the positive aspects of the ongoing work you can find shortcomings of work. In conclusion, the reviewer provides a description associated with the level that is general of last qualifying work and gives it an evaluation. The amount of this review ought to be in one to three pages of typewritten text.
The information for the student’s work that is scientific
The systematic work associated with student paper that is(term thesis) ought to include The items that are following
-Table of contents
– Chapter 1 – theoretical (literary review)
– Chapter 2 – empirical (description associated with procedure for the research, the outcomes of processing and interpretation of the techniques performed, correlation analysis, guidelines)